The Rant: Why Are We Anonymous? Why Do You Need to Ask?

By / /

I’ll admit, I have not been a life-long reader of The Denver Egotist. I was introduced to it about a year ago, and not unlike Victor “I was so impressed, I bought the company” Kiam, I wanted to be a part of it. Now, I am, under the writing name of Felix (after The Odd Couple’s Felix Unger…F.U.).

Yes, we’re anonymous here at The Denver Egotist. Some say the reason is that we’re a group of has-beens. Others say we’re just a bunch of arrogant pussies who wouldn’t dare say any of the things we say if our names were known. Ironically, the people who usually say these things are also anonymous. And there’s a reason for all of it.

Anyone who knows me knows I wear my heart on my sleeve. If you want an honest opinion, you come to me; if you want someone to kiss your ass, you go elsewhere. Truth is important because it saves time and money. If you’ve ever seen the show “House” you’ll know what I mean. House isn’t liked, often not even respected, but he gets the job done and saves lives. OK, so that’s TV, and TV is mostly bullshit, but when it comes to being honest I’m right there with the arrogant doc. Tell the truth in a tissue session and you can hit creative gold much quicker than if you pansy around saying that every idea has merit. Give. Me. A. Break. I’d rather hurt someone’s feelings than hurt the client’s bottom line.

Unfortunately, and I’m sorry for the cliché here, “you can’t handle the truth.” And I’m talking about you, Denver.

This city has to be one of the most incestuous and overly-sensitive creative places I have ever worked. It’s a tightly-knit crowd and there are just a handful of key agencies and players (you know who you are).

How else could Jim Glynn be the copywriter on so many award-winning campaigns over the last decade? He’s good. He’s often great. But in any other city, he’d be just another freelance copywriter fighting for work. In Denver, he’s the go-to guy. I have nothing against Jim, I’ve met him and worked next to him. He deserves respect and has earned his position. But only in Denver could Jim have done what he’s done.

When I got to Denver, I trawled my book around agencies and heard the same names coming up over and over again. When an agency bites the dust, a game of musical chairs begins and the same characters appear back on the scene, doing the same kind of work. Some agencies have their comfortable niches as well, which was thankfully shaken up by the arrival of CP&B.

But above all, something that is tough to take in this city is an honest opinion. And it can get you a black mark for life. In a place where everyone knows everyone, one insult or honest review can go a long, long way.

Imagine, for a second, that the writers of The Denver Egotist came out of the anonymous closet. The economy goes from bad to worse, and jobs become scarce. When an Egotist looks for favors, jobs or scraps of work from the table, what will be the response? From most of the petty people it will be a clear “ha, fuck you. That’s what you get for berating my campaign.” As the ancient Klingon proverb goes, “revenge is a dish that is best served cold.” And it can get pretty damned cold in Denver.

I would love nothing more than to have the freedom to write under my own name. But do I want that small privilege to wreck my career (or at least put a nasty dent in it)? Do I want my family to suffer because I opened my mouth and said “you know, that campaign you did was really fucking awful and you know it. And here’s why.” There are way too many fevered egos around this city that bruise very easily.

Sure, there are exceptions (for instance, Schoenie has thicker skin than a rhino…then again, he’s not originally from ‘round these here parts). But he’s rare. On occasion, I’ve mentioned to people that Denver experience is not quite the same as New York, L.A. or London experience. I’m met with such disdain and venom, you think I’d just dropped trou and put my cock in their pint of shitty Coors Light beer (which would actually improve the taste by the way).

Pardon me for telling the truth, but this city is not, as I’ve mentioned before, an advertising hotspot. It could be, with hard work and dedication. But that’s not going to happen until everyone in this town grows up, realizes their flaws and takes constructive criticism on the chin. And when they brush it off, do something better and say “thanks for the feedback” I’ll happily print my name and address right here.

Until that day, both myself and (probably) every other Egotist will hide under the warm blank of anonymity, continuing to give our honest opinion. Take it or leave it.

Comments

  1. Chris Mackintosh January 14, 2009

    There is no accountability in

    There is no accountability in anonymity and ultimately weakens your credibility. (New threadless word t) I burn bridges left and right. It Keeps me on my toes. I still feed my family and have mass amounts of work. You can tell it like it is and still work in this town. Maybe not on the big campaigns or for the great agencies, but you can do what you love and still get paid a fair wage. Good for me right?

  2. Paul Suggett

    Paul Suggett January 14, 2009

    “Your attention, please. The

    “Your attention, please. The story you are about to see is true; the names have been changed to protect the innocent. For example: George Baker is now called Sylvia Wiss.” – Dragnet, 1987, shitty film with a few good bits.

  3. josh January 14, 2009

    being anonymous only hurts

    being anonymous only hurts credibility. it’s not like you guys are deep throat or anything. if you’re afraid to say something and sign your own name to it, it’s probably not something you need to be writing in the first place.

    don’t simply shit on work from denver – instead, treat it like a critique, and give some feedback about how you would have made it better. hiding behind a veil of secrecy is pretty weak. unless you guys are blogging from north korea, then i understand your angle.

    plus i think it’s weak that nobody’s posted about national hirschfeld taking a dump this morning. that’s a big story in denver. 250 people out of work, a printer that’s been in business for 100 years is now not in business.

  4. Paul Suggett

    Paul Suggett January 14, 2009

    Sorry Josh, I think that’s a

    Sorry Josh, I think that’s a little naive. To say “if you’re afraid to say something and sign your own name to it, it’s probably not something you need to be writing in the first place” is ridiculous. There are plenty of people in this town who don’t want to hear the truth and take it badly. If someone doesn’t call them out on it, that only makes them stronger and more narcissistic. Most of the time, the Egotist is fair and balanced (not in the Fox news way) and shouts out good work as well as bad. But I do agree that the National Hirschfeld news is a big deal. Maybe the Egotists are working on a bigger article as we speak?

  5. M. Westfield January 14, 2009

    it’s not so much the

    it’s not so much the anonymity, but that they fail to produce constructive helpful criticism. It’s not enough to simply call out the bad work, perhaps it would work better to make an open forum/case study of what’s wrong and why and what could be done to make it better.

    I notice they say “this sucks, what do you think?” or “this is genius. you agree?” and that’s about it.

    I’d like to see something put up and have them say “we think this isn’t as effective as it could be because of X,Y, Z. Do you agree? What would you (us the readers) have done to improve this piece/campaign?”

    I’d love to have a place where we could post some stuff we’re working on that we’re stuck on and get some helpful feedback on, but it’s too unsafe an environment for that to happen on TDE.

    in regards to National Hirschfeld – sad day indeed, found out yesterday, already moving rest of our stuff to Lange.

  6. Paul Suggett

    Paul Suggett January 14, 2009

    Interesting idea Michael. A

    Interesting idea Michael. A forum for posting work-in-progress to get feedback is cool. Although I’m not sure how my boss would feel if I were putting half-finished ideas on the web for all to see. Maybe some kind of private forum with a secure login? And perhaps no anonymity for those users, which would help eliminate snide comments from the usual trolls.

  7. M. Westfield January 14, 2009

    Paul,
    That is exactly what

    Paul,

    That is exactly what I’m proposing – a secure private forum with logins so not ALL of the web could see. It would take a bit of trust as well. I used to belong to a now defunct euro board community that had that going on, it really helped foster the idea of community by sharing & growing ideas&designs/pooling our collective resources/brains. I think the Denver design community lacks a true feeling of community.

  8. Erika January 14, 2009

    I thought the point of The

    I thought the point of The Egotist was to HELP Denver suck less, not to point out when, how and why it does suck.

    It doesn’t take a whole lot of thought or effort to say something sucks … or even to hand out generic props …
    I agree with other comments here that in order for The Egotist to stay true to it’s mission — to help make this a better, more collaborative, creative city — then more productive, constructive feedback would certainly add more depth and credibility to reviews. Anonymous or not.

  9. The Denver Egotist January 14, 2009

    We certainly don’t disagree

    We certainly don’t disagree that more thorough reviews and critiques of the work would be nice.

    The issue is that this site doesn’t even come close to paying for itself, and all the money it does make is fed back into improvements (more on this in the coming months). Which means that all of the time spent on this thing is charity. Which means that we don’t always have a ton of time to spend on each news item.

    So we figure it’s better that people are made aware of what’s out there with a superficial post than for us to keep it to ourselves because we don’t have time to initiate an in-depth discussion.

    Certainly not ideal, but maintaining community awareness of local work is a big first step in advancing this city into where we know it will eventually wind up.

  10. wigz January 14, 2009

    Ok, I thought this was cool

    Ok, I thought this was cool until you brought the banquet into the mix.

    Defiling my Coors with your penis is not cool, man. Ha-ha.

  11. David Stone January 14, 2009

    Anonymity undermines

    Anonymity undermines credibility. Especially when everything is so opinion based on this site.

    I know who the Egotists are. They should just step up and tell everyone who they are.

    Although, it would probably hurt the site considerably.

  12. The Denver Egotist January 14, 2009

    You may know one or two

    You may know one or two people who work on the site, David. But we guarantee you don’t know everyone who works on it. Very few people know the full story. Even those who regularly contribute are kept in the dark about certain aspects.

  13. Warren January 14, 2009

    Anonymity doesn’t detract

    Anonymity doesn’t detract from credibility half as much as illiteracy or inability to punctuate or capitalize correctly.

    That said, in this century there really isn’t such a thing as anonymity; there are simply gradients of greater or lesser convenience in tracking down the source of a given post.

    In any area that’s creatively, socially or administratively inbred, the pseudo-anonymity granted by a nom de plume will probably be sufficient to minimize or deflect backlash, even against the most strongly declared opinions; besides, the practice of anonymously publishing missives is very old and has quite a venerable history in many societies, including the US.

    Plus, it can really help prevent the occasional bloodied nose.

  14. Warren January 14, 2009

    Damn. Sorry about the double

    Damn. Sorry about the double post.

  15. Lisa January 14, 2009

    Um…“House”? Really? You

    Um…“House”? Really? You compared yourself to House? Really. Really?

  16. acme.com January 14, 2009

    who cares about anonymity? if

    who cares about anonymity? if it’s an opinion, it’s just someone’s opinion. if it’s an intrinsically good idea, i don’t need the source’s identity to enjoy a good idea. for that, i like the anonymity.

    whomever generates this site has a right to handle it however they choose. it’s their site. it’s BECAUSE of the anonymity that everyone have chosen to regard it so highly. if it were acme joe’s site proclaiming the mission to “help denver suck less”, nobody would care.

    & regardless, i CHOOSE to read this site – be it brilliant or offensive or unhelpful or pedestrian or entertaining. i don’t have to like what’s here or be effected by it or give a monkey’s paw about anyone’s opinion.

    it’s just a WEBSITE.
    on the INTERNET.

  17. PalmerPolanski January 15, 2009

    and a darn good one. I enjoy

    and a darn good one. I enjoy it .

  18. Big Ern January 15, 2009

    Interesting post. I don’t

    Interesting post. I don’t think your pussy-footed dissing of Jim Glynn was really necessary though.

  19. Alter Ego January 15, 2009

    Who gives a soggy dogshit

    Who gives a soggy dogshit anyway? This blog is, and always has been, mediocre at best. I come here for a good laugh, that’s about it. I constantly fail to understand why so many get a hard-on in regards to what this site has to say, anonymous or not. More often then not it’s filled with bush league commentary that does little to “help Denver suck less” and is inundated with content lifted from much more reputable sources.

  20. Neil January 15, 2009

    What do Jim Glynn and

    What do Jim Glynn and Schoenie have to do with this minutiae-ridden rant?

    You guys keep talking about Denver sucking less but you don’t give any answer and you rarely point the finger at those who are doing it well (besides CPB all the time and TDA every once in a while).

  21. Blondie January 16, 2009

    Hah! You tell ‘em, Egotist

    Hah! You tell ‘em, Egotist people, whomever you are. I would expect no less from you wonderfully sarcastic and candid geniuses. I was born and raised here, and apparently I am one of a select few who also believes that most people here can’t handle the truth. The people out there who dislike the anonymity of this site only want to know who you are so they can hate you. Nobody cares who you are when you are praising someone’s work. It’s when you give negative opinions that they want to know who your identity, so they can make you their scapegoat. Kudos to you guys for not giving them the satisfaction.
    Oh, and anyone who DOES like Coors Light should be smacked… Felix, I think you might be my soulmate.

  22. Dan Barron January 16, 2009

    Re the comments along the

    Re the comments along the lines of “it’s easy to criticize work. Why don’t you offer how to improve it?”:
    Having worked as an ad journalist long enough to not consider the term an oxymoron, I’d say it’s the ad guys’ job to make the ads better and it’s the critics job to say how well they did. No other division of labor makes any sense.

  23. Jamie January 16, 2009

    I’m content to read a site

    I’m content to read a site that just says, “this sucked” or “this is great”. As an creative in an ad agency, you might only know if your client liked it, but what does the creative community think of it?
    Just don’t go backpedaling when you crap on someone (cypher13). It makes you appear weak like mouse (Russian accent). I would like to say however, that the new cypher13.com landing page is brilliant. (but boooooo browser resize)

  24. Moxie January 17, 2009

    The word “helping” implies

    The word “helping” implies that there is some level of thoughtfulness in what is published here, which isn’t always the case. Who gives a shit about the stuff we all know sucks? Great. It sucks. Move on. The real good bits are found in the dialog that goes on in the comments section. That story on Craig Whatshisname is a perfect example … And Egotist, your readers will hold you accountable to your mission. It’s their job to do so. Without your audience, you’re nothing. The goal was a lofty one … but a good one. Don’t let lack of money or resources or even sheer laziness keep this passion project down. The Egotist, just like Denver, has the potential to be great.

  25. Andy January 17, 2009

    The Egotist posts work and

    The Egotist posts work and articles to plant the seed. The credibility comes in when the Denver Ad/Design community posts responses and comments.

    Unfortunately most of these comments are “that guy is wearing an ugly shirt,” or “this is just a copy of ______.”

    If you are looking for credibility, try keeping snide remarks and deconstructive criticism to YouTube videos and help keep the Egotist credible.

    It is up to us. They post the creative, we create a credible community.

  26. Jmartin January 17, 2009

    Please don’t tell me who you

    Please don’t tell me who you are Dear Egotist. Personally I like not knowing who you are. I give you props for being honest and doing something positive to create a buzz among the Denver ad community. Am I the only one that thought the Wizard of Oz was more credible as a big floating head instead of an ordinary old man? I liked the old guy, but I respected the Wizard. Probably because he scared the crap out of me as a kid, but he got my attention.
    You got my attention and apparently alot of others as well, and I think that’s a great start…

  27. Jeremy Elder January 19, 2009

    I find it really interesting

    I find it really interesting when people continually come back to a blog/site to shit on it.

    If you’ve left a comment here, then TDE is clearly doing something very right, because you’ve taken time from your life to come here, read, and get fired up enough to rant about it. If you consider the site “mediocre at best”, then why leave a comment? Blog-slumming? Blog charity? Go fuck yourself.

    I don’t live in Denver, but holy shit you guys like to whine a lot. It’s like Republicans with the Dixie Chicks; if you don’t like it, don’t fucking read it. Or, if you think you could do a better job, why don’t you start your own site and prove it?

  28. Paul Suggett

    Paul Suggett January 19, 2009

    Can I be your friend Jeremy?

    Can I be your friend Jeremy? Please check the yes or no box at the end of this note.

    YES [ ] NO [ ]

  29. Crock January 19, 2009

    Another perspective from

    Another perspective from outside Denver (though I used to live and work there):

    Anonymity has little to do with opinions or balls or opinions about balls. It serves the purpose of keeping the information flowing. If I knew the guy/gal next to me were an Egotist writer, I’d act differently and so would you. Moles=goodness, except in my backyard (bastards!).

    That said, TDE has every right to take shots at the work without signing names. A vibrant ad community isn’t just a gooey mass of brotherly art-school lovin’. It’s an engaged group of competing professionals. And if there’s a funny smartass standing on the sidelines taking a piss on most of the stuff that rolls by, all the better.

  30. Jeremy Elder January 19, 2009

    @Paul
    YES [X] NO [ ]

    @Paul

    YES [X] NO [ ]

  31. Paul Suggett

    Paul Suggett January 20, 2009

    Sweet! Now I have two

    Sweet! Now I have two friends. Although the other one may not count as it’s my laptop.

  32. M. Westfield January 20, 2009

    Paul,
    I’ll be your friend

    Paul,

    I’ll be your friend too.

  33. Powder Cowboy February 4, 2009

    Don’t you people have

    Don’t you people have deadlines to worry about? Seriously…

    Who f-ing cares?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *